Abstract | Symptomatic Erectile dysfunction | Table 1 | Results for Table 1 | Regular Use
Quality of Erections | Side effects | Satisfaction | PPPI comment

Symptomatic Erectile dysfunction
Patients with definite symptomatic erectile dysfunction were presented a wide range of treatment options, including no treatment, vacuum constriction device, pharmacological injection therapy and surgery. Of the 559 men 266 (48%) opted to undergo evaluation for treatment with a vacuum constriction device. Tumescence was maintained with 1 or more latex constriction bands. Each patient was instructed in the use of the vacuum constriction device in the office to ensure competency. After an in-office demonstration 28 patients decided not to use the device and the remaining 238 patients did. At the time they obtained the device, patients were asked if they could be contacted for follow-up information, and 216 (91%) consented. These 216 men formed the database for the initial follow-up. Risk factors and prior therapy are listed in table 1. Patient age ranged from 36 to 83 years, with median age of 65. Patients were mailed an initial 3-month questionnaire by the urologist, which was returned by 161 (75%). In April 1991 a second long-term questionnaire was mailed to the original 216 patients, of whom 14 were unavailable due to death (4) and lost to follow-up (10).

A total of 115 patients returned the second questionnaire, representing 57% of the available 202 patients from the initial database. The initial and long-term follow-up questionnaires were identical except for an additional 6 questions in the latter which primarily assessed quantitative frequency of use patterns. The questionnaires addressed a wide range of subjects concerning the vacuum constriction device, including use patterns, patient satisfaction, partner satisfaction, quality of erections, side effects and complications. To decrease potential bias, all results from the questionnaire were tabulated by a second independent observer. Statistical comparisons in responses between groups were then performed using a 1-tailed chi-square analysis. Student's paired t-test was used to compare frequency of use variables among patients responding to the second questionnaire.
  Privacy Policy
Home
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright Performance Plus Inc. 2005